Sex work and the law: which model puts safety first?

Heading (1)
Abby

Abby Dudley posted this on 01/10/2025

Recently, Scotland has been exploring changes to its sex work laws, specifically considering the criminalisation of those who buy sex, not those who sell it. This approach is known as the Nordic Model, already in place in countries like Sweden and Norway. It’s sparked important conversations about how different legal frameworks impact the lives, safety, and dignity of people who sell sex.

Currently in England, the law doesn’t make it illegal to buy or sell sex outright, but street-based sex work is criminalised through offences like loitering or soliciting in public. This means that people, mostly women, who work on the streets risk being prosecuted. These outdated laws disproportionately affect some of the most marginalised in society and push them further into danger and invisibility.

So what are the legal options and what do they mean in for people who sell sex?

Woman-walking-at-night_852x365_acf_cropped

Full legalisation

In this model, sex work is made legal and regulated. Workers must register, obtain a permit, and pay taxes, similarly to other professions. It aims to reduce exploitation, improve working conditions, and weaken organised crime.

Examples: Germany, Austria, the Netherlands

Supporters say:

  • Sex work should be formally recognised as work.
  • Potential for regulation to improve safety and labour rights.

Critics say:

  • It often benefits brothel owners and third parties more than workers.
  • Some sex workers avoid registration due to privacy concerns.
  • A hidden “second tier” may emerge, where unregistered workers face increased risks.
Heading (2)

The Nordic Model (Sex Buyer Law)

Under this approach, selling sex is legal, but buying it is a criminal offence. The goal is to reduce demand and eventually eliminate sex work.

Examples: Sweden, Norway, Iceland, France, Ireland, Northern Ireland

Supporters argue:

  • It discourages exploitation by reducing demand.
  • It frames sex work as a form of violence or coercion against women.

Critics argue:

  • It drives sex work underground, making it more dangerous.
  • Clients fear arrest, so meetings become more rushed and hidden, reducing negotiation time and increasing risk.
  • It doesn’t address poverty, trauma, or lack of options that often lead people to sell sex.
woman-stairs-scaled-e1759323732528_852x365_acf_cropped

Decriminalisation

This is the model supported by many sex worker-led organisations, as well as Amnesty International, the World Health Organisation, and the Royal College of Nursing.

Example: New Zealand (the only country with nationwide decriminalisation)

Supporters argue:

  • All laws that criminalise sex work are removed – sex workers can avoid going through the criminal justice system which deepens marginalisation.
  • Sex workers have the same legal protections as other workers.
  • Police focus on serious crimes like trafficking, violence, or coercion.

Critics argue:

  • It doesn’t eliminate stigma or fix broader issues like gender inequality or poverty.
  • Exploitation and abuse can still occur, as in any industry.

Reported outcomes in New Zealand since adopting the decriminalisation model are:

  • A significant drop in trafficking.
  • Around 70% of sex workers feel more confident reporting violence.
  • Greater control and autonomy for those selling sex.
Welcome-Casework_852x365_acf_cropped

Safety is key

At One25, we believe that any discussion about laws must begin and end with safety. In 2022, we consulted our staff, volunteers, and the women we work with to better understand what legal model would serve them best. The result was that decriminalisation would offer the greatest protection.

Criminalising sex workers, directly and indirectly, only deepens stigma and increases risk. Decriminalisation allows the police and services to focus on real harms: exploitation, violence, and trafficking. It gives women more power to make informed choices, seek support, and report abuse without fear of punishment.

Ultimately, the law should serve to protect, not punish.

Log in

Forgotten password?

Back to log in

©2025 - Registered in England. Reg. No. 3362644. It is registered as a charity. Reg. No. 1062391

Website: Atomic Smash